Going Sustainable Events Live Forward Blog About Us
sustainability-indicators-index-by-alphabet

Sustainability Indicators Index by Alphabet

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Have more resources that we should include? Email us at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

A

  • AASHE STARS (2014): The Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System™(STARS) is a transparent, self-reporting framework for colleges and universities to measure their sustainability performance.

Back to top

B

Back to top

C

Back to top

D

Back to top

E

Back to top

F

  • The Future Economy (2014): The Future Economy describes the new, innovative business models cropping up nationwide, like CSAs and co-ops, and provides a framework for evaluation.

Back to top

G

  • G4 Sustainability Reporting (2013): GRI’s G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines is a journey of discovery, helping organizations to focus their sights on setting goals, measuring performance and managing change in order to implement better practices. 
  • Genuine Progress Indicator (adopted in Maryland in 2009, most recent indicator data from 2011): This is an extension of the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare goes and beyond traditional economic indicators to include measures of social and environmental wellbeing to assess how development affects long-term prosperity. 
  • GINI Coefficient (created in 1912) is a measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent the income distribution of a nation's residents. This is the most commonly used measure of inequality. The World Bank has a lot of data (most recently from 2013). 
  • Global Goals (2015): These are 17 goals that were agreed upon in Sept 2015 to be worked on worldwide to ensure sustainable development and achieve 3 things: end extreme poverty, fight inequality and injustice, and fix climate change.
  • Gross National Happiness (2015): This is an alternative to GDP and is determined from surveys based on feelings of economic, environmental, physical, mental, workplace, social, and political wellness in Bhutan. 

Back to top

H

  • HDR (Human Development Report) (2015): This index is based on health (life expectancy at birth), education (adult literacy rate & gross enrollment ratio), and standard of living (logarithm of gross domestic product per capita at purchasing power parity).
  • Happy Planet Index (2012): This index is calculated with the formula Life Satisfaction times Life Expectancy divided by the community's Ecological Footprint. There are scores for 151 countries based on how many long and happy lives each produces per unit of environmental output. 

Back to top

I

Back to top

J

Back to top

K

Back to top

L

  • The Legatum Prosperity Index (2015): This offers a measurement of a country's prosperity that is expanded beyond GDP to include well-being. 

Back to top

M

  • Madison Sustainability Plan (2011): The goal of the Madison Sustainability Plan is to provide guidelines and priorities for decision-makers to aid in making Madison more resilient and sustainable

Back to top

N

  • New Economics Foundation Wellbeing Index (2012): This is a guide designed for use by voluntary organizations and community groups to measure the well-being of the people those groups support to improve projects and services.
  • Next Generation Quality of Life (2014): This is a tool designed to help communities measure their quality of life based on 7 indices (Vitality, Earning, Learning, Social Capital, After Hours, Cost of Lifestyle, and Around Town) and compared to other communities. 

Back to top

O

Back to top

P

  • People’s Report Card (2015, individual country report cards coming in 2016): This is based on the UN Global Goals and represents how well the world is currently doing. The goal is to get to an A on all goals by 2030. 

Back to top

Q

Back to top

R

Back to top

S

  • Santa Monica Wellbeing Index (2015): This index measures well-being in the city of Santa Monica based on 6 categories: outlook, health, community, economic opportunity, place, and learning. It is intended to be used by the community and city government as a tool to drive meaningful improvement in the city.
  • Social Progress Index (2015), developed by Social Progress Imperative, D.C.: This provides a framework for measuring social progress based on 3 categories: basic human needs, foundations of wellbeing, and opportunity. The index has scores for many countries (not all) worldwide.
  • STAR Community Rating System (2012): The STAR Community Rating System (Sustainability Tools for Assessing and Rating Communities) provides a clear, data-driven approach to assessing social, economic and environmental progress. It aims to be a comprehensive sustainability measurement system and a catalyst for local action.
  • Subjective program evaluation - “Culturally responsive evaluation”: This is an evaluation framework that includes the community in assessing the success of a program.
  • Sustainable Measures (pre-2010): These measures are to be used as sustainability alternatives to traditional economic, environmental, and social indicators.

Back to top

T

Back to top

U

Back to top

V

Back to top

W

  • WI Sustainability Report (2014): This report is designed to present a holistic summary of sustainability in Wisconsin based on economic, social, and environmental metrics.
  • WI Sustainability Company Survey (2013): This survey is sent to Wisconsin companies to gauge their sustainability efforts.

Back to top

X

Back to top

Y

Back to top

Z

Back to top

Have more resources that we should include? Email us at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).